Manufacturer

SHENZHEN FIRST UNION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD: which brands it is named as making

Named in a government registerCompany registry recordChina45 linked brands

On the public record, not assessed

SHENZHEN FIRST UNION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD is in this dataset because a government authority published a record naming it against 45 notified brands. Everything on this page is read out of that record. Nothing has been assessed: no production licence, export licence, capacity figure, patent or court record has been checked for this company, so the fields listed as uncollected below are gaps in collection, not findings.

Record fetched 11 October 2026. No assessment date, because no assessment has been run.

What the register states

Each row is a value published by the authority named at the foot of this page. Nothing here is derived.

Company name as notified: SHENZHEN FIRST UNION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD
Other spellings in this register: SHENZHEN FIRST UNION TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD · SHENZHEN FIRST UNION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD · Shenzhen First Union Technology Co. Ltd · Shenzhen First Union Technology Co., Ltd · Shenzhen First Union Technology Co.Ltd · Shenzhen FirstUnion Technology Co.,Ltd
Address as notified: 16-19F, Block F, Xinghang Center, Xingwei Road Crossing, Fuyong Town, Bao’an District, Shenzhen, China, 518103
Country as notified: CN

derived by Traceleaf, not stated by the authority

Country: CN

These are inferences from the company name. They are kept separate from the rows above because attributing them to the authority would be putting words in its mouth.

Brands notified against this company

Each row is a notified brand whose filing names this company. The confidence level says whether the authority stated the manufacturing role or whether it published one field for two roles.

AquavapeConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
BECOConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Blu Bar 2.0Confirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany and FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
BoulderConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
ChillarConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
ChillbarConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
ECIGW LIMITEDConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
FLAVOURTECConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
IVGConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
IVG Air 2 in 1Confirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
IVG Air 4 in 1Confirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
IVG Air PodsConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
LYNDENConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
MIGOConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
MIGOConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
NVEEConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
QIS BARConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
SALT + deviceConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Salt Plus deviceConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
SMITEYConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
USONICIGConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VAPOURCORE RETAIL LIMITEDConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VAPTIOConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VAPTIOConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEVConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE AMBER WAVE 1.8% 20mg MangoConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE BLACK PURPLE WAVE 1.8% 20mg BlackcurrantConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE CANARY WAVE 1.8% 20mg PineappleConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE CLASSIC 1.8% 20mg TobaccoConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE CORAL WAVE 1.8% 20mg WatermelonConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE GOLD 1.6% 18mg TobaccoConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE GOLD WAVE 1.8% 20mg PeachConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE GREEN 1.6% 18mg CucumberConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE INDIBLUE WAVE 1.8% 20mg BlueberryConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE ISLAND WAVE 1.8% 20mg TropicalConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE MAUVE WAVE 1.8% 20mg GrapeConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE PLUSConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE RED WAVE 1.8% 20mg StrawberryConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE SUNGLOW WAVE 1.8% 20mg CoconutConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE TURQUOISE 1.8% 20mg MintConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VEEV ONE YELLOW GREEN WAVE 1.8% 20mg LemonConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VIVA KITAConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
VivakitaConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
X2OConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
XEOConfirmed
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium) under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as confirmed: the authority states the manufacturer separately from the company that filed the notification, and a second national register names the same company independently, placing it outside the European Economic Area where it cannot be the EU-side importer. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.

Not collected yet

Each row is a check Traceleaf has not run for this company. Uncollected is not the same as zero, and not the same as nothing found.

Chinese-language company name: placeholder — not collected
Unified social credit code: placeholder — not collected
City and province: placeholder — not collected
Year founded: placeholder — not collected
Registered capital: placeholder — not collected
STMA production licence: placeholder — not collected
Export licence: placeholder — not collected
Declared annual capacity: placeholder — not collected
Product lines and coil technology: placeholder — not collected
Patents: placeholder — not collected
Litigation: placeholder — not collected
Certifications: placeholder — not collected
Headcount: placeholder — not collected

Records

The authority that published the record, and the instrument that obliges it to. The register's own title, its endpoint and the field each value was read out of are operational detail and are not published.

FOD Volksgezondheid / SPF Santé publique (Belgium)
Published under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8). Fetched 11 October 2026.
Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany
Published under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21. Fetched 11 October 2026.

A notification is a statement the notifying company made to that authority on that date, published because the instrument above requires it. It is evidence of what was declared, not a finding by Traceleaf and not an endorsement by the authority.

This is a demonstration build. There is no billing, no checkout and no account, and the locked sections above are rendered from the same dataset as the free ones and are obscured to show where the line would fall.

Looking for a factory we don’t cover?

Name it and we will trace it next. Every miss is demand data: the factorys people search for and we cannot answer are what decides the order we build coverage in.