TraceleafAdmin
Factory

Topband Technology Co., Ltd.

深圳市宏威科技有限公司
Unified social credit code 914403906269989M
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
No production licence foundExport licence on file
01

Registry record

Founded
2018
Registered capital
$5.3M
Headcount
3,551
Hiring trend, 12 mo
▲ 89% in posted roles
Declared annual capacity
161.0M units
Capacity rank
7 of 1269 factories tracked
Product lines
podsceramic coil assemblies
Coil technology
quartzceramic
Certifications on file
UL 8139
02

Capacity against its peers

Capacity figures come from environmental impact assessments, which state annual output in units. They are filing figures, not measured output.

Declared annual capacity across all tracked factories
All 1269 tracked factories, bucketed by declared annual output. This one is marked in green.
Where this factory sits among its peers on size. The point of the chart is the position of the green bar, not the shape of the distribution.
Each mark: one capacity band. The bar's height is how many of the tracked factories declare an annual output inside that band.
How to read: Only the band containing this factory is labelled; the axis ends print the lowest and highest declared capacity in the set. Hover any bar to see its range and how many factories fall in it.
This factory declares 161,000,000 units a year, which puts it above 99% of the 1269 factories tracked. Capacity is a filing figure, installed output as stated to a regulator, not a measurement of what shipped.
Source: Environmental impact filings
03

Patents and litigation

Counts from patent and trademark filings and from published court judgments. A defendant count is not a finding of liability.

Patents and court records on file
Three counts for this factory, read from the Chinese patent office and the published judgments database.
Whether this factory builds its own designs and whether anyone has taken it to court. Suing and being sued are deliberately shown side by side, because which side of a case a plant is on means very different things.
Each mark: one count for this factory: granted patents, cases it brought, and cases brought against it.
How to read: All three bars share one scale, so their lengths are directly comparable. A suit as defendant is a case filed, not a case lost.
Patents grantedSuits as plaintiffSuits as defendant
This factory sues more often than it is sued: 2 cases it brought to 0 against it, which is the pattern of a plant defending designs it owns. It holds 13 granted patents. Judgment coverage is incomplete by design: not every case is published, so a zero means no published case was found, not that none exists.
Source: Patent and trademark filings; court judgments
Everything above is free · 3 sections below are paid

The verdict, the licence check, the flags and the price range stay free and always will. The chain behind them (who builds it, who ships it, and the record for each step) is the paid half.

04

Exporters it owns or fronts

Paid

Trading companies tied to this plant through shared officers, addresses or contact details.

Exporters it owns or fronts is part of the full chain
  • Shell exporters
  • Shared identifiers
  • The linking record
Demo build. No billing is wired, so this button does nothing.
05

Brands using its hardware

Paid

Every label whose device has been matched to a mould, coil spec or marking this factory makes.

Brands using its hardware is part of the full chain
  • Brand list
  • Match confidence
  • Dates observed
Demo build. No billing is wired, so this button does nothing.
06

Records

Paid

Every source behind every claim on this page, with what it gives and when it was last checked.

Records is part of the full chain
  • Every source cited
  • Snapshot + date
  • Direct links out
Demo build. No billing is wired, so this button does nothing.

This is a demonstration build. There is no billing, no checkout and no account, and the locked sections above are rendered from the same dataset as the free ones and are obscured to show where the line would fall.

Looking for a factory we don’t cover?

Name it and we will trace it next. Every miss is demand data: the factorys people search for and we cannot answer are what decides the order we build coverage in.

Not wired up in this demo. The fields are disabled and nothing is sent or stored.