Manufacturer

WAN CHAI TRADE SOLUTIONS LIMITED: which brands it is named as making

Named in a government registerCompany registry recordHong Kong40 linked brands

On the public record, not assessed

WAN CHAI TRADE SOLUTIONS LIMITED is in this dataset because a government authority published a record naming it against 40 notified brands. Everything on this page is read out of that record. Nothing has been assessed: no production licence, export licence, capacity figure, patent or court record has been checked for this company, so the fields listed as uncollected below are gaps in collection, not findings.

Record fetched 11 October 2026. No assessment date, because no assessment has been run.

What the register states

Each row is a value published by the authority named at the foot of this page. Nothing here is derived.

Company name as notified: WAN CHAI TRADE SOLUTIONS LIMITED
Address as notified: Room B3, 9F, Building 1, ST Martin, Pak Shek Kok， Tai Po District, Hongkong, Ms. Yang 95103473
Country as notified: HK

Brands notified against this company

Each row is a notified brand whose filing names this company. The confidence level says whether the authority stated the manufacturing role or whether it published one field for two roles.

AL CARLOInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
BANG BANGInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Big MouthInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Chill PillInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Coffee MillInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Crypto StarInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Crystal DropInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Crystal DropInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Crystal DropInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Crystal SaltInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
CUCKOOInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
CUCKOO ICE BLASTERInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
DIYInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
FantasiInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
FIGHT4VAPEInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
FIREWOODInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Fresh Vape CoInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Geek Bar MelosoInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
InstaFillInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
iWhoopInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Juicy MillInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
JUMBOInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Lost DropInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
MACHAWAInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Pacha MamaInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
RawChemInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
RiotInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Rocket GirlInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
StarInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
STARKInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
SUGAR LADYInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
TOXICInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
TROPIQInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
UAHUInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Vozol Neon 800Inferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
WhoopInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Whoop BarInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Whoop PlusInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Whoop PROInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.
Whoop UPInferred
notified 2026-10-11
Why we think this
The reasoning, in the words the record supports
Stated in a notification published by Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21, fetched 11 October 2026. Recorded as inferred rather than confirmed: this register publishes the manufacturer and the importer in a single field, so it names the company against the brand without saying which of the two roles it holds. It is evidence of a supply relationship for the notified product, not of exclusivity.
Records behind it
No source record is attached to this link, so the sentence above is the inference and nothing stands under it yet.

Not collected yet

Each row is a check Traceleaf has not run for this company. Uncollected is not the same as zero, and not the same as nothing found.

Chinese-language company name: placeholder — not collected
Unified social credit code: placeholder — not collected
City and province: placeholder — not collected
Year founded: placeholder — not collected
Registered capital: placeholder — not collected
STMA production licence: placeholder — not collected
Export licence: placeholder — not collected
Declared annual capacity: placeholder — not collected
Product lines and coil technology: placeholder — not collected
Patents: placeholder — not collected
Litigation: placeholder — not collected
Certifications: placeholder — not collected
Headcount: placeholder — not collected

Records

The authority that published the record, and the instrument that obliges it to. The register's own title, its endpoint and the field each value was read out of are operational detail and are not published.

Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL), Germany
Published under Directive 2014/40/EU Art. 20(8), as transposed by TabakerzV §§ 20–21. Fetched 11 October 2026.

A notification is a statement the notifying company made to that authority on that date, published because the instrument above requires it. It is evidence of what was declared, not a finding by Traceleaf and not an endorsement by the authority.

This is a demonstration build. There is no billing, no checkout and no account, and the locked sections above are rendered from the same dataset as the free ones and are obscured to show where the line would fall.

Looking for a factory we don’t cover?

Name it and we will trace it next. Every miss is demand data: the factorys people search for and we cannot answer are what decides the order we build coverage in.